Build Canada Homes' design framework faces further criticism

Design choices could worsen Canada's housing shortage, says commentator

Build Canada Homes' design framework faces further criticism

The federal government's newly released Build Canada Homes Investment Policy Framework has clarified what the program will do, but also exposed what it won't do—and that gap could undermine its housing goals, according to a prominent housing commentator. 

Mike Moffatt, founding director of the University of Ottawa's Missing Middle Initiative, says the framework still won't solve affordability for middle-class families despite its stated goal to "finance, build and industralize" social and mixed-income housing on federal lands. 

The framework's emphasis on standardized designs from the CMHC Housing Design Catalogue could create a significant issue. Of seven Ontario designs featured in the catalogue, none exceeds three storeys, and only five of 21 total units have three or more bedrooms.

"Given that Canada has a substantial shortage of three-bedroom and larger homes, and the need for our cities to densify, BCH's prioritization of small, low-rise homes is a peculiar choice," Moffatt wrote in his analysis.

Missing pieces on innovation and regulation

While BCH promotes modern construction methods, it excludes funding for research and development. The framework explicitly states the program "will only consider investments to the extent that they support its core mandate of directly increasing the amount of affordable housing."

This creates what Moffatt calls a "valley of death" for emerging technologies. Beyond cost concerns, the framework ignores a harder problem: "zoning and building codes often make the most promising innovations illegal to build."

One area that works

The framework does offer clarity where it matters most—affordability. "Housing is affordable when rents are no more than 30 per cent of before-tax income (based on median household income of an area)," the framework states, providing income-based tranches that Moffatt called "exceptionally detailed and common-sense."

Yet affordability clarity cannot mask broader concerns. Tim Richter from the Canadian Alliance to End Homelessness warned that without clear federal objectives, "federal dollars [will be] spread a mile wide and an inch deep, and housing affordability and homelessness will not improve."

Make sure to get all the latest news to your inbox on Canada’s mortgage and housing markets by signing up for our free daily newsletter here.