Economists split over Trump’s surprise Fed pick

Kevin Warsh’s nomination raises new questions over rates, inflation and housing costs

Economists split over Trump’s surprise Fed pick

President Donald Trump’s decision to tap former Federal Reserve governor Kevin Warsh as the next Fed chair immediately sharpens the debate over how far and how fast borrowing costs might fall for households and housing markets.

Investors rushed to reassess everything from Treasury yields to precious metals, while mortgage professionals weighed what a Warsh-led Fed could mean for rate relief that had already proved elusive.

Markets test a ‘hawkish but not dove’ narrative

Warsh is widely seen as a surprise but credible choice, with a long record as a policy hawk and a recent tilt toward Trump’s calls for lower rates.

“I don't want to say it's a total surprise... he was considered a hawk, but recently he seems to have aligned himself with Trump, so it's kind of difficult to assess how the market is going to accept this nomination,” Peter Cardillo, chief market economist at Spartan Capital Securities, said.

“We just have to see whether or not he will be influenced by the White House,” Cardillo said. “My guess is that he will not and that he will look very carefully, he will be somewhat balanced in in terms of inflation, labour markets. Less determined than Powell, but not that far apart.”

Some strategists framed the move as dollar positive but constrained by politics. “His view on the balance sheet and what it means for rates suggest that the yield curve in the U.S. could steepen further as short rates fall, while longer-term rates perhaps stay sticky, or even drift higher, because of lack of U.S. fiscal credibility,” Elias Haddad, global head of markets strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, said.

“In terms of the dollar impact, it's neutral and for equity markets, it's also neutral.”

Fed independence, politics and affordability pressures

The appointment lands in an environment where mortgage borrowers have already been grappling with elevated rates and uneven transmission of Fed policy into housing finance.

Fed cuts in 2024 and 2025 did not always translate into cheaper home loans, with brokers urging clients to focus on bond yields, liquidity and rate stability rather than headline moves from Washington.

Bankrate’s Sarah Foster warned that political pressure on the Fed risks compounding affordability strains.

“First came inflation, then came historically high interest rates, and both have pushed up Americans’ cost of living since the pandemic,” she said.

“Many Americans are growing increasingly tapped out and understandably yearn for the now-bygone days of low borrowing costs and mortgage rates. The Fed does share some responsibility for many of the affordability challenges they face, even if unintentional. In economics, however, there are always trade-offs.”

“Americans want affordability, not just in housing, but at the grocery store, the gas pump and on everyday bills,” Foster said.

“But history shows that cutting interest rates for political reasons, not economic ones, can make those problems worse. Inflation can balloon further, and many interest rates across the economy can move in the opposite direction of the Fed: up. When monetary policy goes wrong, everyday Americans pay the price.”

For now, market reactions have pointed to modestly higher long-term yields and a firmer dollar, developments that could keep mortgage rates from falling quickly even if the Fed edges toward cuts later this year.

Analysts noted that Warsh’s preference for a smaller Fed balance sheet might allow short term rates to decline while keeping longer term funding costs elevated.

Stay updated with the freshest mortgage news. Get exclusive interviews, breaking news, and industry events in your inbox, and always be the first to know by subscribing to our FREE daily newsletter.