Dismissal of FHFA’s inspector general sparks debate over political interference in mortgage oversight
The Trump administration’s removal of Joe Allen, acting inspector general at the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), has intensified concerns about the politicization of America’s mortgage watchdogs and the potential ripple effects for global housing finance.
Reuters reported that Allen, a 40-year veteran of the Department of Justice, was dismissed this week after attempting to share documents with federal prosecutors in Virginia—information described by two sources as “constitutionally required.”
Another source said the material could have impacted pending legal proceedings. Allen had also been preparing to alert Congress that the FHFA was refusing to cooperate with his office, but was terminated before he could do so, according to individuals familiar with the matter.
Nearly two dozen inspectors general have been removed or sidelined during Trump’s second term. The White House has also restricted the budget of the council overseeing these watchdogs, further eroding independent oversight.
A more combative FHFA under Pulte
The FHFA, established after the 2008 financial crisis to stabilise the United States mortgage market, supervises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac—entities that guarantee around half of America’s $13 trillion mortgage market.
Under director Bill Pulte, a Trump ally, the agency has taken a more combative stance, launching criminal referrals against several of the president’s critics, including New York attorney general Letitia James, Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, and senator Adam Schiff.
Pulte’s leadership has not gone unnoticed. Pulte, who previously made his fortune in homebuilding, recently announced the dismissal of dozens of Fannie Mae staff as part of an internal restructuring.
Market confidence and operational risks
The FHFA declined to comment on Allen’s ouster. The agency’s website listed the inspector general’s position as vacant by Monday, though archived pages showed Allen in post as recently as late September.
When the agency’s internal watchdog is abruptly removed—especially under controversial circumstances—it can undermine confidence in the agency’s independence and its ability to police misconduct.
This uncertainty may make lenders, investors, and servicers more cautious, potentially tightening credit conditions or increasing risk premiums on mortgage-backed securities.
The FHFA’s inspector general is responsible for investigating fraud, waste, and abuse within the agency and the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs).
With the post now vacant, there is a risk that potential misconduct goes unchecked, leading to operational vulnerabilities. Ongoing legal battles involving high-profile figures could also distract agency leadership and further destabilise internal processes.
Stay updated with the freshest mortgage news. Get exclusive interviews, breaking news, and industry events in your inbox, and always be the first to know by subscribing to our FREE daily newsletter.
